Decent, but already losing its way - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei ServiceNow: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
26. Mai 2014
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company is leading edge in technology, the future. Generally successful in attracting high quality staff, low to high. They pay well and if you joined early enough, your options could deliver a nice nest egg. Whether or not you agree with your goals and targets, they are typically well communicated.

Kontras

If you're an ex-colleague of anyone on the sr leadership team you may be allowed the benefits inside the bubble. For everyone else: you will be digging for gold dust and hopefully be deemed ok. This company should be avoided if you think on your feet and are proactive. Employees will be asked to respond to every whim of their manager and smile while running out to comply. All the bling outside charisma of the 'startup' culture doesn't mean a thing... The culture is mostly corporate, risk averse and set in 50 shades of grey. Customers are treated well before signing, and pretty much ignored until they raise their hand. It all could have been so much better but I feel ServiceNow has missed the opportunity to build a great company. Shareholders won't mind in the short run.

Mehr Bewertungen zu ServiceNow entdecken

5,0
2. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pay, benefits, flexible time off

Kontras

Workload and difficult work life balance

2,0
17. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

ServiceNow had a differentiated platform and products. Early on the culture had a startup energy that was rare for a company this size collaborative teams, ownership, and a sense that people actually cared about outcomes. Working with large enterprise customers on complex workflows was interesting work.

Kontras

The ServiceNow I joined was a different company. As headcount increased, so did the bureaucracy, layers, and friction that rewarded politics over execution. The layoffs of the last few years were handled poorly little transparency, inconsistent communication, and decisions that felt made far above with little thought for the people affected. The "cost optimization" messaging rang hollow against continued executive spending. For a company that sells workflow and people process tools, the irony of a chaotic RIF wasn't lost on anyone in the field or on customers. Leadership political dynamics were real. The right team, the right manager you had cover. Performance alone didn't protect you.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle