Strong business, poor people mananagement - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Expedia Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
26. Okt. 2016
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I am proud to be part of one of the strongest companies in the travel industry. There are many great innovations, initiatives and new partnerships that are truely shaping the online travel world. Changes come slowely but over the years I've seen many great ideas coming true and really "revolutionizing travel industry with the power of technology" (which is Expedia's mission)

Kontras

Whether you like Expedia or not (unfortunately) depends on the team you are at and most importantly who is your mananger. I've seen many very talented people giving up on Expedia just because they had no opportunities to grow, no support from their managers or simply because (quite openly) they were not the right fit from the PERSONAL point of view of the team leader. HR politics despite the size of the company are still very poor and in many cases decisions are made based on a personal opinion of a manager. Hcom and EAN have recently started addressing some of this gaps but the GMM (market management team) stays very much behind. It's a shame. As for myself I am constantly evaluating the pros of a strong business organization and cons of poor mananagement practices.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Expedia Group entdecken

5,0
24. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

work life balance lots of pto

Kontras

limited room for growth in the company

2,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Kontras

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle