Good place to work at but - Anayst bei Veeam Software: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
12. Jan. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexible, good compensation, great culture.

Kontras

Lack transparency and lack direction which equates to too much uncertainty.

avatar
Reaktion von Veeam Software
2y
Thank you for taking the time to leave a review and sharing your positive feedback on our Compensation & Benefits as well as great culture. Our rapid growth and continuous process improvements can make change challenging. We recommend that you attend our monthly Employee Matters town hall, where our leadership team discuss our strategic direction and objectives, and also directly answers questions from Veeamers. To actively contribute your insights, please consider taking part in the annual Veeam Voice survey and our regular Pulse Surveys, as they play a pivotal role in shaping our culture and direction.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Veeam Software entdecken

5,0
17. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

solid coworkers good product market fit

Kontras

already a very large company?

avatar
Reaktion von Veeam Software
6d
Thank you for sharing your experience! We're happy to hear you've connected with great colleagues -building strong teams is something we take seriously. Veeam has grown significantly in the last years, which can take some getting used to, but we work hard to maintain the collaborative spirit. Welcome aboard, and we hope the first year is just the beginning of a great journey here.
2,0
3. Feb. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Kontras

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

6
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle