50/50: Erweichen von Singapur - Unspecified bei Softing: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
16. Apr. 2017
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Nette Mitarbeiter Neuankömmlinge mit angemessener Erfahrung erhalten eine leitende Position. Work-Life-Balance ist gut Das Geschäft wird besser Sehr wenig Politik

Kontras

Kein guter Ort, um Ihre Karriere zu beginnen, wenn Sie ein frischeres Vertrauen haben, ist sehr, sehr schwer aufzubauen und Sie werden möglicherweise nicht in Ihr Interessengebiet versetzt. Wenn Sie ein erfahrener Mann sind, können Sie eine leitende Position bekommen. Aber innerlich gefördert zu werden, ist eine andere Geschichte. Kein Prozess zur Ausbildung oder Karriereverbesserung. Nr. 1 zu 1 Leistungsbewertung jedes Jahr, die Metriken der Gehaltserhöhung jedes Jahr ist unbekannt. Sehr schlechte Kommunikation zwischen der Geschäftsleitung und dem Mitarbeiter in diesem Bereich. Die Gehaltserhöhung liegt jedes Jahr zwischen 1% und 4%. Alles entwickelt sich in einer Produktlinie. Es gibt keine jährlichen Karrierepläne. Das Management konzentriert sich zu sehr darauf, Geld zu verdienen. Gute Mitarbeiter sind gegangen und einige Mitarbeiter im Unternehmen planen auch, etwas Besseres zu tun.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Softing entdecken

5,0
28. Dez. 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Gute Bezahlung und Wettbewerbslandschaft

Kontras

Zu viele Hüte werden von allen erwartet, die dort arbeiten

3,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The company offered good employee benefits. The medical insurance coverage was strong, including dental coverage and family coverage, although there were concerns that some benefits might be reduced in the future. Annual leave entitlement was also reasonable at 18 days. The company also had capable and hardworking employees, especially in the engineering team. Many team members had strong product knowledge, supported customers responsibly, and tried their best to keep the product running despite limited resources.

Kontras

In my opinion, the main issue was weak local leadership and poor product direction. For a small office with mainly one key product, the company needed a capable leader who understood the product, the market, the customers, and the technical challenges. The leader should be able to work with the team to drive the product forward, improve sales direction, and identify where the product still has market value. However, from my experience, local leadership did not appear to have enough domain or technical understanding to support the product effectively. There was no clear strategy to strengthen the product, improve market positioning, or rebuild sales momentum. Instead, the workplace became more political and less performance-driven. During the restructuring period, employees did not feel strongly represented or protected by local management. Many decisions appeared to be executed from the top down, with little visible effort to challenge, explain, or propose better alternatives for the local team. This created frustration and disappointment, especially among employees who had contributed to the product for many years. There also seemed to be favoritism in how people were treated. In my view, capability, product knowledge, and real contribution were not always the main factors in how employees were valued. This affected morale and trust within the team. For a small company, leadership quality is critical. When the local leader does not deeply understand the product, the customers, or the technical side of the business, it becomes very difficult for the team to succeed. The issue was not only business downturn, but also lack of strong leadership, lack of transparency, weak employee support, and a culture that became too political.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle