Decent place to work - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Fluor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
7. Apr. 2010
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Lots of changes in past year, and company has done well to adjust. Strong emphasis on learning (as long as it doesn't cost any additional $$)

Kontras

Excessive level of mid-management. Promotes training but doesn't do anything about it. Won't send employees anywhere or pay for it. Maybe it's just my group. Not a lot of confidence in the industry right now.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Fluor entdecken

5,0
25. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very transparent, room to grow.

Kontras

can be political, not what you know but who you know.

4,0
26. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Hi visibility projects. Rewarding experiences Competitive Pay

Kontras

Sub-bar Project Management team. Condescending at times. Entitled. Sense of superiority. Confusing Hierarchical Structure and chain of reporting. Two managers. Administrative Organizational Unit Manager and a project manager. You report to both. Not flexible at the implementation of latest and most robust design software. Extremely cautious about the implementation of AI, sacrificing productivity and cutting edge competitiveness. Extreme focus on employees training on the companies policies and procedures, but not on the technical development of employees. Do not internally promote, rather they hire from outside for vacant higher positions. Remote workers are considered second class citizens. Not equal to those who work from the office, despite their credentials and pedigrees.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle