Toxicité - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Ypto: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
28. Sept. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salaire et aussi grosse voiture

Kontras

Management laisse faire les petit chef ayant des comportement toxic

Mehr Bewertungen zu Ypto entdecken

1,0
12. Apr. 2018
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

knowledgeable and experienced employes, potential of contributing to modernization of Belgian Rail

Kontras

numerous appointments of protégés by CEO; no HRM management and lived values; most members of management team lack knowledge and expertise; no communication initiatives, especially in light of major outsourcing deal; lack of basic-basic-basic IT life cycle management and project management method/culture

4
avatar
Reaktion von Ypto
3y
Dear, Thank you for taking the time to write this review. We are always open to continue to improve. Please note that your review is from some time ago and we have already made a lot of improvements in the meantime, including HRM which has been taken in hand. We offer our managers LeadingPROS, where we work with the Ypto values and how they can best be expressed, ... Have a great day. Ypto
1,0
31. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Some managers genuinely want to improve things. Nice people around, mostly competent freelancers. However, if you can fake competence well enough, you can easily make a lot of money while doing very little — they seem unable to tell the difference between real expertise and good acting

Kontras

The company suffers from serious structural problems. Management lacks domain expertise and clear direction, frequently relying on freelancers to make both operational and strategic decisions. Projects often start without proper scope definition or planning, creating constant chaos. Working with public funds for SNCB, they claim to value public procurement compliance. Yet when they hire specialists to ensure that compliance, they consistently sideline them in favor of internal politics and personal relationships. Permanent staff face almost no accountability, while competence takes a back seat to who has the ear of management. This leads to poor governance and significant waste of public money.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle