A complete dead end with no future at all - Administrative Assistant bei Tawkify: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
22. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Easy and simple work with no real training required.

Kontras

- There is absolutely no guidance from management - Leadership is poor and support is completely nonexistent - Employees are left entirely on their own with no direction - Salary is extremely low - There is no realistic expectation of any salary increase - There is no growth, no progress, and no real future in the role - The job feels like a complete dead end

avatar
Reaktion von Tawkify
1mo
Thank you for your feedback. Matchmaking is often romanticized, but the truth is it's hard work. We strive to paint a very accurate picture during the interview process of the goals, time commitment, and effort required to be successful in this role. It's not for everyone, but it can be very rewarding and we feel grateful to our clients to support them on their journey. Thank you for your service and we wish you well in your future endeavors.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Tawkify entdecken

5,0
27. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- The convenience of working from home - Support from experienced professionals - Building long-term client relationships - Pleasant work environment - Independence in managing your schedule

Kontras

Some clients have preferences too difficult to accommodate.

2,0
22. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Amazing team, and great clients but service is sub par

Kontras

Tawkify was a great company to work for, but about two years ago the business began shifting toward a more scaled and outsourced operating model. Key functions such as screening and date coordination were moved offshore, and matchmaker caseloads increased from roughly 20–25 clients to more than 80 clients each. Unfortunately, that was not the experience I originally signed up for. The focus seemed to shift from personalized matchmaking to a high-volume, production-oriented model. In my opinion, the quality of service declined as matchmakers were expected to manage significantly more clients with fewer resources and less individualized attention. As a result, many of the company's strongest and most experienced matchmakers chose to leave. While the company may have improved operational efficiency, I believe the client experience and overall quality of matchmaking suffered, making it difficult to justify the premium price point.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle