Great environment, poor place to work - Technical Analyst bei R.R. Donnelley: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
31. Dez. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The people were great to work with. Fellow employees were always willing to help and point me in the right direction when I had any questions. After leaving the company, the only thing I miss is the friendship of the people I worked with there. The one other good thing about my time with RR Donnelley was that they were very flexible with my school schedule. Although just before I left, I was told that there would be less tolerance for my school schedule because it was straining relationships with project managers because of my less than immediate availability. I was required to work during class much of the time and it had a negative effect on my coursework.

Kontras

The cons of this job were many. SALARY: To start off with, my salary of $50,000 was actually fairly decent for an entry-level full-time position, but the reason it was offered to me at that amount is because it's generally understood that there are very few, if any raises and I knew that if I continued there, that would likely be my salary for the remainder of my time there. PROGRAMMING: As a Technical Analyst (Programmer), this job is very lacking in opportunities to really use creative solutions to problems. The programming languages used are next to obsolete and I felt like I was digging myself into a deeper and deeper hole there. I felt that the longer I stayed there, the further I was falling out of touch with technologies and languages that would make me more valuable to other career opportunities. Yes, I was getting better at the tools used at RR Donnelley, but thus, I was digging myself into a hole of staying longer and longer there without being able to leave. WORK-LIFE BALANCE: The work-life balance was terrible. I understand that with current processes and technologies, there has to be a certain amount of overtime and working at home, but the amount of overtime with RR Donnelley was overwhelming. Often times, there was at least one or two days per week that I would work 12 or more hours in the office. Then about two to three times per month, I would work an 18 - 20 hour day in the office. That was just overtime in the office. In addition to that, I worked probably another 2-3 hours from home every other day. I also usually ended up working a couple hours most Saturdays and Sundays. When I mentioned that to the HR rep in my exit interview, he didn't seem surprised at all and basically told me that it was just the nature of a full-time job. EMPLOYEE INVESTMENT: The company doesn't invest in its employees. Occasionally, we would have a barbecue for special occasions, but that was probably once every six months. The first computer they gave me to use cost a lot of time in waiting for things to load. Most of the time, webpages loaded one horizontal line at a time. I brought in my own keyboard because the one they gave me was really old and the keys were sticky. The only company branded things they gave me were a water bottle during safety week, and a t-shirt for their 150th anniversary that we were only allowed to wear to work for four days. Working there for a while made me feel like upper management didn't care about their employees very much at all. MORALE: In general, the morale of the employees was very low. We were over worked and under appreciated. High turnover turned into higher workload and more people who were new and couldn't help with the big projects yet. TRAINING: Training for new employees was pretty much non-existent. Most of the tools used were internally developed with little to no documentation, so it was very difficult to train oneself, but there were no resources to receive training either. My experience with training was terrible, but just before I left, there was some work on creating a better training program, so maybe that will be better for others starting with RR Donnelley.

Mehr Bewertungen zu R.R. Donnelley entdecken

5,0
11. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work life balance People are great They take time to teach you if you dont know something

Kontras

Nothing here is a con

2,0
7. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The schedule is pretty consistent, and you get benefits, PTO, and sick time. Depending on the team you're on, you may have the chance to work holidays or pick up overtime at 1.5x pay. There is also Shift differential pay. Some teams also have hybrid schedules, which is a nice perk. It's a solid place to get experience and build your resume. The skills and connections you make here can lead to other opportunities in the future.

Kontras

Pay: Things may be different now, but when I worked there, the pay felt uneven depending on the position. For example, proofreaders made around $17/hour, document specialists around $19/hour, and workflow coordinators around $22/hour (before shift differentials). Given the responsibilities of some roles, the compensation didn't always seem to match the workload. Parking: Parking was honestly one of the worst parts of working there. You almost have to consider it part of your commute. The main option is a multi-level parking garage, and your choices are usually either the top floor, where your car bakes in the sun all day, or the floor below, where the available spots are typically all the way in the back. Accessibility / Commute: The office is located in a very busy area, which can make getting in and out a hassle. Between traffic, the light rail crossings, finding parking, walking through the garage, crossing the lobby, and taking multiple elevators, the commute often felt longer than it should have been. Lunch: Lunch is a 30-minute unpaid break. It's standard, but it does mean your day ends up feeling longer since you're either working 7.5 hours plus lunch or staying an extra 30 minutes before heading home. My Experience: I worked on a team that supported a large law firm. From my perspective, the team often felt understaffed and overworked. During my time there, I also saw management change several times, which made it difficult to maintain consistency. One thing that was particularly frustrating was the lack of internal promotion opportunities. When leadership positions opened up, the company often chose external candidates instead of promoting people who were already doing the work and understood the clients. It was discouraging for employees who wanted to grow within the company, and I saw several experienced and knowledgeable coworkers leave after being passed over for advancement opportunities. That said, this was my experience with one specific team. Other teams may have had very different experiences, management styles, and opportunities.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle