employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Intercare Community Health Network

Ist dies Ihr Unternehmen?

Started out great...each year is a bit less great - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Intercare Community Health Network: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
26. Dez. 2017
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Most of the coworkers at my location can also be considered friends. It is rewarding to help patients who may not receive it in many situations, and the majority appreciate our time and contribute to improving their healthcare.

Kontras

Increasing emphasis on quantity over quality. Poor communication related to expectations /protocol changes, changes not communicated, procedures changed by administration but not communicated anybody at patient care level at my site. Rare (1 in past 9 months) employee meetings due to unwillingness to block schedule/close clinic for 1-2 hours. Support positions stay empty, there have been multiple nursing positions left unfilled for over 6 months, with the workload falling to the remaining floor nurses on top of their original duties. Inconsistent Expectations and no accountability for employees in the same position, lack of teamwork and support, repeated refusal to do certain duties and provide support by the same few clinical staff with no repercussions. Many employees feel unappreciated, low morale.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Intercare Community Health Network entdecken

5,0
18. Sept. 2023
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

great team to work with, very mission oriented

Kontras

lower salary, high stress, too decentralized

1,0
18. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

• Patients are generally kind, appreciative, and grateful for care • Mission-driven population that values continuity and provider relationships • Opportunity to gain experience in community health / FQHC setting • Colleagues at the frontline level are often dedicated and clinically capable

Kontras

• Leadership prioritizes productivity metrics, cost containment, and financial performance over clinical judgment, provider well-being, and sustainability • Burnout is widespread due to excessive workloads, poor boundary enforcement, and minimal structural support • Benefits are limited and poorly structured; clinicians are routinely nickel-and-dimed over time, resources, and minor expenses • Low psychological safety; staff are reluctant to raise concerns due to fear of retaliation, increased scrutiny, or marginalization • Hostile workplace behaviors toward new providers are tolerated, with leadership failing to intervene • Favoritism and nepotism undermine fairness, trust, and transparency • Publicly disclosed executive compensation appears elevated when compared to frontline cost-cutting, limited benefits, and high clinician turnover • High turnover disrupts continuity of care, affects morale, and negatively impacts patient access and trust

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle