Poor Company - CCR bei Inovalon: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
5. Jan. 2017
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

This is poor company. There are no pros about working here.

Kontras

This company (Columbia MD) office to be exact has done a horrible job at communication, training and really treats their employees poorly. Granted I was a contractor but they let me go out of no where (with NO EXPLANATION) and filed false information about me in their system. I contacted the Bowie office and they declined to take the information out and to help me. For which I had to state I was making a complaint in order for them to even call me back. Smh, I would NEVER recommend this company or work here again in my life. High turn over, poor attitudes, poor people = poor company!

Mehr Bewertungen zu Inovalon entdecken

5,0
4. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good team and good company to work with

Kontras

Benefits can be better and teams can coordinate better

1,0
9. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The company was a great place to work under the leadership of its founder and CEO. It offered strong products, a positive culture, and exceptional sales leadership. However, after the founder and president departed, the company’s direction and leadership changed significantly, impacting the overall employee experience.

Kontras

Since the leadership transition, the focus appears to have shifted away from employees and more toward financial performance and investor perception. The company has gone through multiple rounds of layoffs, while at the same time hiring sales representatives who often seemed underprepared for the role. Much of the enablement function was reduced or eliminated, with an increasing reliance on AI-driven solutions. Leadership within my department was challenging (toxic). There was a noticeable tendency to favor individuals brought in from a previous company, which negatively impacted morale and team dynamics - leadership was clueless . The leadership style often came across as inflexible, with limited openness to alternative perspectives or collaboration. It was a “I know best because I’m so experienced so it should be THIS way” mentality . As a result, cross-functional relationships suffered (sales leaders didn’t respect dept leadership) and there was little partnership with sales leadership to reinforce training and enablement initiatives. One bright spot was the Sales Engineering organization. The team was highly skilled, well-respected, and led by an exceptional leader who fostered a strong culture and delivered real value to the business. Overall, while the company offers solid products and has talented people in certain areas, the culture, leadership decisions, and ongoing organizational instability make it difficult for me to recommend as a long-term career destination.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle