Not Military Friendly - Spanish Interpreter bei Innodata: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
29. Mai 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Remote / Spanish work with a consulting team

Kontras

My initial application was approved, then rejected because National Guard obligations "were too many days off in the year" (this is once a month work nearly only requesting one day off a month for it). Then when I responded with "Isn't that illegal to deny employee opportunities because of Military obligations?" they then proceeded with the interviewing. Passed both the English and Spanish examinations, received positive feedback with a video call with a Spanish speaker on their team, and was told to wait to receive feedback within the next few days. Here I am thinking I would receive an offer and would gladly work for them because this position excited me. To then receive an email saying I did not pass the Spanish exam, even though I did and received a confirmed email stating I did. I sent this back and was apologized to saying "oops, was working too fast, yes you did pass but the onboarding interview did not move you forward". All along I knew very well they were already against my Military dates from the beginning but now they have a legitimate legal response to rejecting me, even though feedback as to why they weren't moving forward wasn't provided.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Innodata entdecken

5,0
2. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Kontras

Days can get repetitive and dry

2,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The vast majority of the people I worked with on projects for a major internet company were friendly and educated. The pay was decent for trivial remote work.

Kontras

Projects were tedious at best and seemed poorly designed. Rubrics designed either by the contracting company or Innodata were often poorly thought through, and rules tripped over themselves or remained ambiguous. The company we were sub-contracted to was infamous for not replying to inquiries asking for clarification for how to evaluate the AI. Prompts given to the AI were often incoherent--just a word or name, often misspelled--which left us making arbitrary decisions about how well the AI addressed the prompt. Rubrics were hidden from employees evaluating the AI, though that seemed to be a result of neglect by a company still figuring out how to run things, not an active decision to deceive employees. I left well before the recent waves of layoffs. Management had tried to assure us that jobs were secure, but that seemed delusional given that the contracting company was farming out work through other companies rather than hire us itself.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle