Stagnant company with outdated practices and no possibility for growth or improvement - Solution Consultant bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
15. Dez. 2020
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work from home Most of the coworkers are nice

Kontras

No regular raises (we get a minuscule raise that happens maybe every 3 years and forget getting a raise when you get a promotion or more responsibility) Took away the home internet expensing, which should be standard for companies that require you to have high-quality connections for videoconferencing (decision of the CEO when he was CFO) Total refusal to control the sales team, so sales teams dictate how the entire company is run, which is a problem when they only understand commissions, not how to qualify a deal or even how the software works "Diversity and inclusion" is an empty gesture because leadership from the executives to vice presidents to middle management is decidedly not diverse. New hires are not diverse, but if they are, they are used as token gestures. Sexism, misogyny, and homophobia have been regular occurrences since I've been here, so the problem is clearly with the "good old boys club" culture that has been developed over years because management refuses to acknowledge the serious problems. New managers are always bean-counters looking to fire people. In the middle of a pandemic, they have fired people, meaning that people lose their health insurance. That's the quality of life they want for you because it's all about the dollar for them, not human beings.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
17. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Good people - Good benefits -

Kontras

- OffShore heavily. Good portion of company is based outside of the US

3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle