Great for a fresher - Software Engineer bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
19. Juni 2020
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Worked in the GT Nexus subsidiary of Infor which works on the product named Infor Nexus. Great wing to work with. People are helpful. After the aquisition of GT Nexus from Infor, things have started to work in a standard way and the Infor culture has spread here according to the seniors which restricts various perks, but as per my experience it's a great place to start as a fresher or a person with medium experience. Most of the frameworks used for development are internally made and if u have a zeal to explore, there is a lot to learn. Managers are cool and helpful. Great work life balance. Gets the feel of a typical product based company.

Kontras

Most of the engineering heads who were considered extraordinary have started to move out since the perks became less post Infor acquisiotion. Gives the feel of a remote wing of a great parent company.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
23. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work is challenging and exciting

Kontras

May have to work on christmas

3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle