Never going to get paid much more than you are hired on at. - Project Director bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
5. Feb. 2019
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Remote work is available and this is the ONLY pro. I would like to list nothing but 20 words are required.

Kontras

Salaries are not compwtivite and raises are far and few. Made less money in some years than I did in the years previous and I was not in sales. Bonus structure is dependant on other factors outside of your control. Like dangling a carrot. Promotions are nearly always given to outside applicants. Revolving door for Oracle employees. Save your time. Employee is not important and treated as replaceable

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
5. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Kontras

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
3w
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle