Potential to be great, if there was an overall company culture - Senior Software Engineer bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
27. Aug. 2012
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Some pretty clever people with lots of experience bought in from all over the world. Things have started to turn around now that Charles is running the show. It's now a technology company again, rather than a sales company. Some new initiatives have really started to get customer's attention, which is positive.

Kontras

There isn't any company culture. Infor is built by integrating lots of smaller companies. The result is lots of fiefdoms and directors trying to out compete each other. There doesn't feel like there's an overall technology direction as there are so many disparate stacks. There is no feeling like everyone around the world is moving in the same direction.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
23. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work is challenging and exciting

Kontras

May have to work on christmas

3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
2w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle