The corporate mindset has taken over the nonprofit warm, caring feeling, resulting in a severe culture change. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Goodwill: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
15. Aug. 2014
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The people at the Corp. office are pretty much the best-smiling, cheerful, they like their jobs. Very good benefits, good PR and presence in the community, good 'spin'. At Corporate, you'll find lots of people willing to help you, if you just ask. (you gotta find the right person to ask, though!) Up until a year and a half ago, I would've rated Goodwill with 5 stars. It was THAT good.

Kontras

What comes to mind when you think about working for a non-profit? -That the work for and with the organization would make you feel good, right? -It's because you'd want to feel like you're making a difference, yes? -And since Goodwill is a HUGE name, one would think it'd be AWESOME to work there and you'd be making a difference, right? . That's what I thought & that was my experience when I worked there. Until 2013. * From the date of incorporation of Goodwill Industries of Orange County Ca., 1932 until 2012, it wasn't 'all about the money'. Money coming in of course was important, but our raison d'etre WE were working at Goodwill was everything associated with serving the <mostly> disabled people we called 'clients' who were working, getting trained, getting placed in jobs at the org. That was our Mission, to "provide people with disabilities and other barriers the opportunity to achieve their highest levels of personal and economic independence", & by God we did a GREAT job. They were our clients, WE worked for THEM. It was quality vs quantity and we were a quality org. Every day, you could see the reason. Every single frickin' day. We had a common goal, a common focus, a common need to fill. We got all sorts of caring, 'warm fuzzy' feelings about what we were doing. And it was good. CON: before I was let go, the vision changed; from " "Goodwill of Orange County envisions a world where all individuals with disabilities and other barriers will have the opportunity to participate in a full range of life's experiences, including competitive employment. In support of this vision, we will maintain leadership in creating and providing quality education, training, and employment services to empower individuals to be productive and independent, based on their abilities and interest." to "Over the next five years we intend to double the number of people we serve by providing services that are innovative and driven by the needs of the community." Read those two again. Perhaps it would be clearer to say 'innovative and driven by the needs of the media'. Translation: Quantity vs quality. A revolving door philosophy of 'get 'em in, count 'em, give some service that might help them, then they're outta here.'. CON: The employees organization-wide are now being choked by fear and apprehension. This is partly due to management's obsession with suspicion and mistrust. In the last 2 years, state-of-the art security and video systems have been put in place everywhere except in the bathrooms and IT. NOW, when you talk to someone about anything, you look over your shoulder to see if anyone's around; you talk in an office so the cameras won't see you; you wonder who you can trust (answer: NO ONE). When it gets so bad that an ex-employee who was let go attempts to send an email the next day to their coworkers, management finds out about it, quickly tells IT to block and eliminate those emails, even erasing them off staff emails whether they're opened or not, including any 'sent' emails to that ex-coworker, well, are they that afraid of a stupid goodbye email? Programs are being cut, long-term employees are being fired/let go, the upper management and HR rule by fear. It's not feeling remotely like a non-profit organization should feel. When you open up a can of root beer, you expect root beer and not tap water, yes? When 5 people are let go/position eliminated/reduction in force from the same department right when they walk into work, within 3 business days (one person was let go the day they got back from their honeymoon), that doesn't really seem like something a caring, 'warm fuzzy' organization like Goodwill would do, does it? No, it doesn't. They're gone, to the Goodwill Gulag. Along with appx 30+ people, from January-June 2014.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Goodwill entdecken

5,0
9. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I get paid consistently. I don't have to stress about restraining people or raising my voice. My clients are friendly.

Kontras

The pay is that good. I have to travel to NYC every day.

2,0
9. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work fulfilling both physically and socially, dealing with donors and fellow employees for this retiree and former legal and business professional.

Kontras

Creepy, clannish, petty, and cultish management is more interested in humiliating others under the guise of "following rules" many of their own making than in ensuring that the work facility is properly equipped to handle daily workflow. Communication nonexistent. Managers pop in and out, apparently stationed at some secret location.  Robotic replies to legitimate work questions when they weren't out-and-out nasty.  I've occasionally dealt with this sort of folks, but never an entire collection of them cheering each other on as might appear in some deleted scene from "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest." Poisonous and bizarre. Recommended only for the Abnormal Psychology student.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle