Average Company - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Global Switch: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
16. Juni 2022
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Location, work-life balance, some colleagues are very interesting and have a lot of experience

Kontras

Poor employee-company relations, everything judged by the money, no intelligent decisions made. Blame culture is distributed down from the main office. High staff turnover.

avatar
Reaktion von Global Switch
3y
Thank you for your sharing your feedback, and for your suggestions. We constantly evaluate feedback and try and take constructive action as appropriate.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Global Switch entdecken

1,0
1. Feb. 2024
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Actively invest in online platform, however, bad UAT experience due to rush launch and little scenario tests "Fun" workplace to see some staffs enjoy idle / gossip time while others bustling around. Offers medical insurance (coverage for essentials), and bonus (but not appealing comparing to competitors). Very slow career progression, no work life balance.

Kontras

Micromanagement and toxic environment. Not possible to make change without approval from top management. Hierarchical of approval procedures due to lack of trust and too much of documentation work, leading to low efficiency to get things done. Little engagement activities in the office, no team building activities for department across regions. Office locates far away from the city, little natural light / view from windows. Aging property with signs of technical issues.

2
1,0
13. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Easily give tidbits and foods

Kontras

1. No team work, all think highly of themselves and quick to point fingers to vendors when things go wrong. 2. Biased and quietly racially preferred One singular foreign race over others despite their qualifications, mostly they got the job by recommendation rather than merit. 3. Over demanding out of scope from management despite paying peanuts for vendors. 4. Poor top and middle management practices drove high turnover rates with in-house teams and even with vendors

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle