Great benefits, DEI and colleagues but poor career growth trajectory options and average pay - Corporate Services bei Enbridge: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
25. Okt. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great benefits, bonus, DEI really matters, pension contributions, PTO/SDOs, training and learning offerings, great colleagues/leads (including management at the department level), community donations/volunteering time allowances

Kontras

Tone deaf removal of flexible work policy/WFH despite demonstrated efficiency of remotely and already geographically diverse working teams (seriously, no one wants to commute hours per week just to sit on MS Teams calls all day with their team or other teams already spread out across the US and Canada), average pay compared to the rest of the industry, change to the bonus structure that poorly factor individual team contributions, no offerings of tangible career growth opportunities or promotions (growth and progression is non-existent and employees are encouraged to move laterally which is problematic for experience/knowledge keeping and attrition), ongoing people resourcing challenges that remain unaddressed by the executive and senior leadership teams and an expectation to do a lot more with a lot less.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Enbridge entdecken

5,0
30. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pay is fair Plenty of growth opportunities

Kontras

The scope of work limited to gas field

1,0
15. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great local coworkers who care about their work and support one another. Strong regional culture with many dedicated and capable people. Decent benefits and valuable experience in a large organization. Local teams have continued to perform well through significant change.

Kontras

Micromanagement exists across too many levels of the organization, which slows progress and hurts morale. Corporate leadership often feels disconnected from regional teams and does not always communicate changes clearly or effectively. Decisions that impact U.S.-based employees can lack context, transparency, or understanding of local realities. There also appears to be a gap in workplace culture and management style between headquarters and regional operations. While local teams remain strong, broader leadership issues create unnecessary frustration and make it harder for people to do their jobs well.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle