Mirror Image - Order Fullfilment bei Dow: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
4. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Employees are more focused on others activities. TL targeting skilled employees by listening unproductive employees. TL himself is seen more in the canteen than at the desk. Management thought that Girls are very safe under TL.

Kontras

Team Leaders may lack comprehensive process knowledge and exhibit deficiencies in leadership. Furthermore, there is a perceived absence of accountability among Team Leaders regarding financial escalations, as well as a failure to develop strategies for error prevention. A significant portion of team member time appears to be allocated to non-work-related discussions. Additionally, a clear disparity in treatment is evident between third-party and directly employed staff, with third-party payroll employees appearing to be disproportionately targeted.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Dow entdecken

5,0
16. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Kontras

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2,0
22. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Kontras

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle