Good Experience for a Season, But Not Long Term - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Devil's Thumb Ranch: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
27. Sept. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great location and ski pass discounts- that's what most people in the area are there for There are some really great people at the company and you get to meet people from all over the world. Typically there is room to move around departments

Kontras

Does not pay nearly enough for the area- frustrating to see that fast food jobs in the area start higher than many of the hourly rates at the ranch. Communication is a major weakness. Employee housing has seen better days and the housign coordinator is flaky about coordinating and lining up arrivals. While discounted, be prepared to have strict rules about people staying and cameras in comon spaces consistently monitored, althoug soem housing optiosn more than others. They are cutting corners a lot for a company that pides themselves on a luxury experience. This seemed to be due to pressure from the owners.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Devil's Thumb Ranch entdecken

5,0
11. Juli 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Supportive Ownership and Leadership - opportunity for career growth - beautiful location

Kontras

there are no cons - best place to work in Grand County

2,0
29. Jan. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

If you manage to find a job at the spa, cafe, or activities, you'll likely have a good time. Otherwise, prepare for favoritism, politics, and a toxic environment.

Kontras

The employee housing at this ranch is unsafe and disgracefully mismanaged. Mold and maintenance problems persist for long periods and are routinely dismissed, creating living conditions that feel closer to neglect than care. Housing is overseen by HR, yet there is a profound lack of transparency, accountability, and genuine concern for employee well-being. Leadership decisions consistently raise serious concerns, and basic due diligence appears to be treated as optional rather than essential. Repeated patterns of perceived favoritism, inappropriate relationships, and questionable promotion practices have eroded trust across the staff. Employees are left feeling that standards are applied selectively and that safety, professionalism, and fairness take a back seat to internal politics. Health risks tied to unresolved mold and poor upkeep in employee housing are treated as inconveniences rather than urgent responsibilities. A handful of strong managers try to shield their teams, but they are clearly working against a broader culture of, at best, gross indifference. The message from the top is unmistakable: employees are a cost to be managed, not people to be protected. This place runs on damage control, not integrity.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle