A sinking ship burning nonprofit money - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Design Museum Boston: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
12. Okt. 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Small place so you can do a lot - The name and mission sell well - Lots of opportunities for the business to change

Kontras

- The Executive Director decides what work is done and how to do it - Project goals are always shifting at the whim of the ED - The whole team is burning out - Massive amounts of team turn over and very little has been done - The ED lacks any management experience or knowledge but assumes he always knows best since he is the founder - ED has said he knows how to do everyone's job better than they can - Consistently makes bad designs despite the museum's name - Hiring practices are questionable at best in equity and process - The team has to have meetings about how to handle the ED

Mehr Bewertungen zu Design Museum Boston entdecken

5,0
15. März 2022
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great team, working on some amazing projects — you can make impact here

Kontras

Small team — we all wear many hats, we need to grow

2,0
15. Feb. 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Incredible mission and vision on paper. Externally (optically) this organization is going places.

Kontras

They strive to be an innovative, collaborative, and supportive organization but it all falls extremely short. Employees are worked hard, have to reinvent the wheel every few months, and are expected to exceed all goals regardless of capacity (resources, finances, or time). All of the things you’d expect to find at a small startup, however, in addition to all that stress and exhaustion is a toxic underlying attitude. Employees are expected to do without questioning. Consistently gaslit into believing you are “lucky” to work there. You’re hired thinking you’ll be part of this big design movement, have autonomy, or at least be provided the space to give feedback or suggest improvements. Expected to have initiative, but to never use it. Expected to conceptualize, write, and design content which ends up being extremely edited or tossed altogether. The organization is run on optics alone – tokenizing and performative - no real empathy or inclusion is internalized. This leads to a toxic work environment where most people end up frustrated that their input isn’t valued, leading to extremely high turnover.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle