employer cover photo
employer logo

Had a great run, but did not innovate with the times - Product Manager bei Alcatel-Lucent: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
18. Mai 2016
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great benefits, competitive salary, lots of very talented people, some business units have excellent leadership, others not so much.

Kontras

Major uncertainty surrounding the future of the company now that the merger has gone through with Nokia. Many of the business unites are in commoditized spaces, where little innovation is taking place, and the old school Telecom business model is failing. Major consolidation, and massive headcount reduction is on the way. I got out before it started getting really ugly. With the Telecom space so competitive for vendors, the work life balance is non existent; lots of over promising and under-delivering makes for a toxic work environment.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Alcatel-Lucent entdecken

5,0
12. Jan. 2022
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

ALU hat mir viele Möglichkeiten geboten und die Bezahlung war großartig.

Kontras

Ich kann mir keine vorstellen

2,0
11. Juni 2008
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Kontras

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle