Not to good not to bad - HR-Recruitment Specialist bei AMS: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
11. Jan. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Hybrid work model is good, and salary is paid on time. Compensation is decent. The work environment is positive, particularly for employees working on AMS

Kontras

Management needs improvement. In the RPO model, job security is a concern because once a project ends, there may not be another project to transition to.

avatar
Reaktion von AMS
4mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We’re glad the hybrid model and day-to-day experience within AMS teams have been positive for you. We also hear your concerns about management effectiveness and job security in RPO environments. Project-based work can create uncertainty, and experiences can vary by client and timing. We continue to focus on clearer communication, stronger leadership support, and thoughtful transitions where possible as we evolve. If you’re open to sharing more, colleague.feedback@weareams.com is always available.

Mehr Bewertungen zu AMS entdecken

5,0
3. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

No micromanagement Great work life balance

Kontras

Bonus can be hard to obtain

1,0
27. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexible and remote working Great company but with the right leadership

Kontras

Since the leadership change last year, the culture within AMS has deteriorated significantly. The new CDTO’s approach has created an environment that feels increasingly toxic and unsustainable for many employees. There is a strong sense that every problem is expected to be solved—or sidelined—by AI, often without realistic planning, sufficient resources, or input from the teams actually responsible for execution. This has led to confusion, constant shifting priorities, and a lack of meaningful support for getting work done effectively. At the same time, workloads have increased to an unsustainable level. Expectations continue to rise, but without additional resources or clear prioritization. Many teams are stretched thin, juggling multiple high-pressure initiatives with tight deadlines, which only adds to the stress and makes it difficult to maintain quality or balance. More concerning is the leadership style. Communication often feels driven by pressure and fear rather than clarity or collaboration. Many employees feel they are operating under constant scrutiny, which has contributed to widespread stress, anxiety, and low morale across the department. It’s becoming common to hear colleagues express reluctance to come into work, not because of the workload itself, but because of the atmosphere.

6
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle