The first round consisted of a 100-minute online test in combinatorial mathematics, with a score of 10/12 achieved. The second round was a 45-minute Google Meet session with three combinatorial quizzes. The questions were read aloud in English, but the strong accent made it difficult to follow at times, so clarification was needed. The first quiz resembled a high school math Olympiad problem. It required test-taking techniques that a student could develop through repeated practice. However, such skills are not typically maintained or used in later academic or professional work beyond the early years of undergraduate study, especially when moving on to applied research and industry. The session ended shortly after the first quiz. The tone of feedback was unexpectedly harsh, and the remarks suggested that performance on that single task was taken as evidence of broader abilities. This felt prejudiced and unprofessional, especially given that long-term academic and professional achievements are not determined by retaining every exam-solving technique from high school. The interview concluded with a polite exchange, though the overall experience left a negative impression due to the manner in which the feedback was delivered.