Fragen im Vorstellungsgespräch zu Beschäftigung als Software Engineer bei Box

Phone coder pad interview. The interviewer was distracted with a customer problem and barely paid attention. He asked me to repeat myself multiple times. It was very unprofessional. His answers to the interview questions were incorrect in my opinion.

I had a positive experience. I applied online, was sent a coding challenge. And then a phone interview, still waiting for the updates. The recruiter was quite helpful, she helped out throughout the whole process and was understanding about the schedules

Had 30 min phone interview with the hiring manager. Afterwards a friendly recruiter setup a technical phone interview. It didn't go that well but I solved the problem. Reached out to recruiter two more times about by status and she would not respond.

A recruiter reached out to me saying, here a job description let me know if you are interested. Without even mentioning why they were specifically reaching out to me. In any case, I decided to explore this opportunity. So they schedule a chat with the recruiter. The recruiter did not sound too excited or engaged and at one point they were asking basically about my interview pipeline (screeenings, onsites, offers, etc..) . I did not feel confortable sharing too much data points and I gave them a vague answer. The recruiter did not really like my answer and they kept pushing for details. At one point it got very uncomfortable and given the way the recruiter closed the call I already knew they were not moving forward. In fact, after a couple of days I got an email saying that I was not the best match for the role. I had dozen of interviews in the same period of time but nothing like this ever happend to me.

Cultural Fit Phone Interview, Technical Phone Screen - OOJS Callback Function with chance to ask questions about Box afterwards, Technical Assessment Coding Challenge (Demo Engineering - one week long assignment), On-site Interview

Typical recruiter connection, technical phone screen, onsite interview. Box is very friendly and has nice people. Most they do is with python, and one better know python in my perspective if decides to interview. You can certainly interview in any language; however, I found the interviewer's question is coming from pythonic thinking. In other words, a question is asked that can be done easily in python, but will need more effort and be more complex to do in C++ for instance.

Normal questions followed by a coding challenge over the web. I had tried the editor before hand and it worked fine. During the interview it kept show the next line cover what I was typing. After flailing for 10 minutes, I changed browsers. Still did not work. I asked to use an external editor was declined. The .interviewer gave me a different link to a different editor. Thsi worked. I started typing. After 2 minutes he said "DO YOU EVEN HAVE AN ALGORTHM." I'm like "yep," Option 1: he was having a bad day. Option 2: he's a real jerk. I finished. No time to check because the editor expired. What made it worse was the interviewer was late and he ended it exactly on time. I finished with less time under more pressure and got rejected. I laughed. I have multiple offers. So look I met "one jerk" who works there. Maybe he is isolated. Maybe it part of their corporate culture. The best part of the interview is the send you a survey afterwards. I was polite but critical of the process. I want my hour back. Ignore the city below. It was an online interview. Glassdoor needs to tweak their form.

The recruiters were absolutely wonderful, but the technical exam was done via hacker rank. They ask 4 questions and give you one hour. They let you pick the programming language you prefer to take the exam in.

The interview process was decently tough. It started with an hour coding exercise with about 4 questions. After that, was 2 back to back interviews with different developers. The interview dealt with basic algorithmic questions as well as design questions. I heard back about a week later. Overall the experience was great.

First round was a Hackerrank, then went on to a final round interview consisting of two separate conversations with one engineer each. My perception was that my first interviewer, who asked me a object oriented design question, wasn't that into it, while my second interviewer, who asked a more standard data structures question, was more attentive.