Arbeitgeberbewertungen für Financial Ombudsman Service | Glassdoor.de

Bewertungen für Financial Ombudsman Service

Aktualisiert am 15. April 2019
455 Bewertungen

Filter

Filter


2,0
StarStarStarStarStar
BewertungstrendsBewertungstrends
Würden einem Freund empfehlen
Befürworten Geschäftsführer
(kein Bild)
Caroline Wayman
286 Bewertungen

Mitarbeiter-Bewertungen

Sortieren: BeliebtheitSterneDatum

  1. Hilfreich (17)

    „InvestigatorGate”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Adjudcator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Adjudcator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Empfiehlt nicht
    Negative Prognose
    Negativ Geschäftsführer

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (Über 5 Jahre)

    Pros

    Some excellent colleagues and reasonable benefits. Some interesting work.

    Kontras

    Anyone with a brain knew all along that 'RussiaGate' was the latest media generated hoax. But the now discredited corporate hacks who've caused a new cold war are still in their jobs.

    Likewise those who created the investigator model on non-existant evidence it could work are still in theres. But they persist because their careers are on the line. Each time, they fill over the cracks creating a new distraction - what's it this time? Horizon.

    Rat an das Management

    Hire the MSNBC host in your Communications Team and to appear on the TSC. It might make the world a safer place - and if anyone can drag this charade out for a further few years, she can.


  2. Hilfreich (1)

    „Team Manager (aspiring exec team)”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Team Manager in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Team Manager in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Empfiehlt
    Positive Prognose
    Befürwortet Geschäftsführer

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (Über 5 Jahre)

    Pros

    Money for nothing really. I work a maximum of 6 hours a day, usually with a long lunch and several drawn out meetings. I don’t have to be there for the same hours as my staff as I just allocate the work out and look at production and quality at the end of the week. Based on that I may terminate some staff contracts if they fail a case too many.

    My job is mostly people management. If you’re nice to me, I will show you favouritism, if you complain about anything I’ll gladly manage you out the door and walk you out myself.

    Excellent leadership from the board. The changes they have made have been revolutionary. Adjudicators are finally expected to work for their days wage, something that has been missing for too long, and team managers are afforded more time to micro manage their teams. Something that we could never do before.

    Kontras

    Staff do complain a lot about being micro managed and bullied. I prefer to call it good people management. I drive the best out of people and make them produce more work over longer hours.

    Rat an das Management

    There is still room for improvement. Staff could spend more time of the phones and working cases if you took away the kitchen facilities and gym. I don’t think staff are pushed hard enough. But overall the CEO and Exec team have improved the service ten fold and deserve their pay rises.

    The CEO does a lot of engaging videos that can be watched in the internal intranet. She is also quite the celebrity, appearing on TV and radio. But she should come down and see the staff on the lower floors. She is adored by many and she could win the moaners over with her presence.

  3. Hilfreich (43)

    „Expected to know and do too much.”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Investigator
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Investigator
    Empfiehlt nicht
    Negative Prognose

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (Weniger als ein Jahr)

    Pros

    Nice people, great benefits, flexible working, nice building and environment, staff care about the work they do.

    Kontras

    staff used to be specialists in a certain type of complaint. This was changed, so now all staff look into everything. This means all staff look at complaints from banking to insurance to mortgages to credit.
    So what you have now are jack of all trades master of none. Staff are answering compliants with zero knowledge of the product or any idea what they are talking about. This also means everything takes longer to answer so targets are harder to achieve.
    On top of this - phone shifts. The call centre has gone, so on top of their own cases staff have to act as call centre staff. Getting shouted at by members of the public because their case hasn’t been looked at yet - probably because staff are too busy on phone shifts or researching a complaint they don’t know how to handle.
    Getting sworn at and complained about just for answering a call is a regular occurance.
    Loads of good Staff have left because they signed up to adjudicate complaints not work in a call centre.

    Rat an das Management

    This comes from a person who loves the FOS and thinks it does great work and would like this to be a job for life. But management need to understand that call centre work and being great at investigations are two completely different roles. Staff HATE the phone shifts. They are detrimental to investions. Reconsider the ridiculous decision to put staff on phones and not have a specialist subject. It makes the role impossible at times.


  4. Hilfreich (1)

    „Cool place to work in”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Anonymer Mitarbeiter
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Anonymer Mitarbeiter

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service

    Pros

    Good with work and life balance

    Kontras

    Too many changes in a short period of time


  5. Hilfreich (14)

    „It is a good job for a graduate or someone with less than 3 years working experience.”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Investigator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Investigator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Empfiehlt
    Negative Prognose
    Befürwortet Geschäftsführer

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (mehr als ein Jahr)

    Pros

    Great colleagues and excellent benefits

    Kontras

    The career prospects are poor. You need to be a long time in the service for you to progress.

    Rat an das Management

    The recruitment process isn’t achieving its goal. Newly recruited employees join FOS to receive the training and the experience and the majority of them leave in less than 12 months. Career progression within the service is so difficult to achieve that it makes sense to receive the training from FOS and go elsewhere to start a career with that training and start getting paid more.


  6. Hilfreich (26)

    „It should be quality over quantity not quantity over quality”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Ehem. Mitarbeiter - Anonymer Mitarbeiter
    Ehem. Mitarbeiter - Anonymer Mitarbeiter
    Empfiehlt
    Negative Prognose
    Negativ Geschäftsführer

    Ich habe in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service gearbeitet

    Pros

    Nice office, good people, can buy and sell holidays

    Kontras

    unrealistic targets, more focus on quantity over quality, late phone shifts = leaving work unreasonably late (phones shift range from 8am-8pm).

    Rat an das Management

    investigations not working return back to adjudication with specialised areas.


  7. Hilfreich (23)

    „General Casework Adjudicator”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Adjudicator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Adjudicator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Empfiehlt nicht
    Negative Prognose
    Negativ Geschäftsführer

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (Über 5 Jahre)

    Pros

    Your fellow colleagues (non management)-location of work

    Kontras

    The chief executive and the board haven't a clue. The senior management all have a vested interest in looking out for themselves so have no interest in standing up to ideas which aren't working. Overall it was meant to cut queues and backlogs but they are bigger than ever.

    Rat an das Management

    Accept that you made a mistake with the investigator model- a one can do all model irrespective of speciality- it doesn't work and targets means wrong outcome reached most of time. And backlogs are bigger than ever before. Money wasted on contracting staff.

  8. Hilfreich (25)

    „Arrogance, ignorance and incompetence - three words to describe the mid and senior management”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Adjudicator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Adjudicator in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Empfiehlt nicht
    Negative Prognose
    Negativ Geschäftsführer

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (Über 8 Jahre)

    Pros

    Great benefits, flexible working, state of the art building, good location

    Kontras

    Most important fact is they don't treat colleagues equally even if they talk about equality, diversity. The biggest impediment created by the senior management is they closed an extremely successful and stable department ( general casework) and set up a new department ( they call it a new way of working) which is now a big failure. Yet they don't want to admit their mistake and are getting rid of old staffs. Their decision has always been erratic with no definite plan of action. They created a toxic environment . Adjudicators in general case work and the PPI are treated unfairly , PPI adjudicators works under constant fear and pressure. You are lucky if by chance you get a good manager but most of them are mere puppets and will never stand by you when there is crisis, all they do their back.

    Rat an das Management

    This new way of working is an utter failure, bring back the old system. Treat adjudicators and junior staffs with respect and care, PPI supported you the most financially so respect their contribution. You are what you are today because of the wonderful staffs, retain them instead of pushing them to leave their job. Cross train existing staff instead of hiring more people. You already have the man power you require to fill in any gaps you don't need any. lastly stop the practise of micromaneging.


  9. Hilfreich (19)

    „Mass claims consultant”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Ehem. Mitarbeiter - Mass Claim Consultant in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Ehem. Mitarbeiter - Mass Claim Consultant in London, England (Vereinigtes Königreich)
    Empfiehlt nicht
    Negative Prognose
    Negativ Geschäftsführer

    Ich habe in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service gearbeitet (mehr als ein Jahr)

    Pros

    The company itself is great, the building and the name is a good sell.
    Flexi start time and finish time

    Kontras

    You don't get as much help when you first join. Most managers don't use the same approach in solving complaints, so what could be acceptable to one manger wouldn't be to another which can be very confusing for the staff as you can get queried for what's not your fault.
    They expect consultants to be responsible for a number of things without increasing salary.
    Favouritism is a big thing amongst the managers and they don't hide it.
    Progression at the start is easy but not much room after.
    Treat start as secondary school kids.


  10. Hilfreich (40)

    „Leadership as good as a Tory Brexit minister.”

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work-Life-Balance
    • Kultur & Werte
    • Karrieremöglichkeiten
    • Vergütung & Zusatzleistungen
    • Führungsebene
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Investigator
    Akt. Mitarbeiter - Investigator
    Empfiehlt nicht
    Negative Prognose
    Negativ Geschäftsführer

    Ich arbeite in Vollzeit bei Financial Ombudsman Service (Über 3 Jahre)

    Pros

    Subsidised cafe, gym, pension, healthcare, there's still a few good people

    Kontras

    There has been astonishing incompetence for ages and no accountability. We lurch from one crisis to another and only scrape through by pulling the wool over the eyes of select committees and independent investigations. There have been 2 major corporate change projects (initially meant to be done as one) - introducing the investigation model and implementing a new technology/case management programme. The complete failure of both is a damning indictment of the oversight and capabilities of the executive.

    Introducing investigation was a good idea. Failing to think it through and properly analyse the trials was incredibly stupid. Multi skilling staff is a good idea. Getting rid of the efficient, better CCD to manage the phones and put more expensive investigators on phone shifts is the type of logic Trump would be proud of.

    Muddling through with no clear direction because you can't admit your mistakes and failures is ridiculous. How can it take 3 years to implement an off the shelf system for what is a pretty basic organisation? Getting new consultants to assess the competence of your old consultants is farcical. The solution to every problem is to appoint lots more consultants. You're talking about 3 horizons now, I can't see us reaching any horizon if the current lot remain in charge.

    The squirming and nonsense spouted at the select committee was frankly dishonest. Yes - we've had more cases in this year but anyone can see we're not doing enough - performance has been hidden by PPI for years and now it's going we're in for a reckoning. They talked of temporarily increasing the levy in the consultation, Trump's wall will be built before that comes down again while she's still in charge. Anyone can see that the case fee is definitely not covering our costs. We can all see that we need to resolve more cases to make the organisation sustainable. None of us object to targets in principle but you need to support your staff if you're going to ask us to go the extra mile, provide sensible systems, a basic direction and priority and use our specialist knowledge effectively. Make us feel vaguely valued and treat the people who are likely to be leaving with some respect and common decency.

    Rat an das Management

    Apply for jobs in the Tory government, your competence is highly rewarded there.